Showing posts with label Broncos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Broncos. Show all posts

New Uniforms for 2023: An Impartial Ranking

 As we approach kickoff for the 2023 Hall of Fame Game in Canton and the official start to the 2023 Preseason, let us take a few moments to review the new uniforms and helmets that we will be seeing throughout the season.

I have ranked the 13 new uniform additions by team, whether it be a single new helmet or a completely new uniform. Additions that were used last year like the Pat Patriot throwback helmet/uniform in New England or the return of the red helmet in Atlanta are not included.

Here we go.

#13 - INDIANAPOLIS COLTS


Nothing about what the Colts did makes sense. They have a regular blue jersey. They have a blue throwback jersey. Why do they need a third blue jersey? From a distance, the pattern in the new blue jerseys will likely be hard to detect. The black outlines around the white numbers will be hard to notice due to being against the aforementioned blue. And this doesn't even take into account how ridiculous these jerseys will look if the Colts also add 'Captain' patches onto the other side opposite the alternate logo placed on the left collarbone.


As for the black helmet, we likely should have seen this coming as a few years ago the Colts changed the color of the Nike swooshes on their white jerseys from blue to 'anvil black.' So does that mean anvil black is now a Colts color?

The Fix: The Colts should have just kept it simple and only added a dark-royal-bordering-on-navy helmet to pair with the blue throwbacks. When you overthink, this is what happens.

Grade: F


#11 (tie) - DENVER BRONCOS

There's a tie for the  #11/#12 spots. Denver comes first alphabetically so I'll explain them first.

A white helmet. That's it. To be paired with Color Rush / Throwback-styled orange jersey and orange pants. 


Why? What does Denver gain from this? They aren't going to have lucrative merchandising increase for a new helmet. The Color Rush costume hasn't changed (the helmet logo has minutely) since it came to be in 2016.

What's worse? In the reveal video, one Bronco is wearing the all-orange costume with orange socks, too. A second Bronco is wearing white socks paired with the all-orange. It doesn't seem like the team even knows what it's going to do with them.

The Fix: Denver has had the same Color Rush uniform since 2016. Alter it by replacing the navy blue with light royal blue trim. Add a light royal blue helmet in the same style. Add appropriate stripes to the socks. Boom.

Grade: D+


#11 (tie) - DETROIT LIONS

A new blue helmet is added for the sole purpose of pairing it with the awful all-grey Color Rush uniform.


I'll ask again...Why? The short answer is that the all-grey uniform didn't match with the normal Detroit silver helmet. I can understand that. But then you create a blue helmet to rectify that one problem and you don't even bother to correctly match the blues of the helmet and jersey? At least it matches the blue of the anniversary patch the Lions will be wearing this year.

The Fix: Detroit's heart was in the right place and their intentions were good. Fix the helmet's shade of blue to match. This oversight reminds me of when the Vikings brought out their current look and their helmets bore a shade of purple that looked like the paint guy at Home Depot put in a little too much red and way too much white when trying to match colors resulting in a lighter, redder shade of purple. It's an easy fix. Admit it. Fix it. Boom.

Grade: D+ (can go to a C if they fix the blue)


#10 - HOUSTON TEXANS

This change may well have slipped under the radar. Select teams are not only adopting Nike's new FUSE template for their jerseys this season, but a small percentage are also using a modified version of the FUSE that has a straight seam across the upper chest rather than the more visible V-shaped seam. Houston is one of those teams. Incorporating that modified FUSE has enabled Houston to 'flip their horns.' Since their inception, the Texans' shoulder stripes (horns) have narrowed to a point directed away from the body. These new horns curl ever so slightly towards the center of the torso instead.




Was this change needed? No. Will it change how we view the Texans' uniforms in a bubble? No.

The Fix: This was a change that wasn't needed. For good or for bad, there's nothing to really fix. It's just...different.

Garde: C-


#9 - CAROLINA PANTHERS

The Panthers' changes were two-fold. 

They altered the hoop-stripes. The only problem is that there are still going to be variations of how those stripes look due to the tailoring of jerseys for players of different positions. This is the same problem Carolina has had for a while.



The second change was in tweaking the shade of blue. Honestly, if no announcement had been made, you'd have been hard pressed to find someone in Bank of America Stadium that said "Gee. Their blue sure looks different this year."

So they altered the hoop-stripes but still have wide variations in how they will look. They changed the shade of blue and almost no one will notice.

The Fix: Find a way to tailor these stripes so that they appear the same on all player positions. Worse comes to worse, change them to look the same as the Colts' hoop stripes. Vary the width of the stripes rather than having all three the same as the Colts do.

Grade: C


#8 - ARIZONA CARDINALS

The uniforms that the Cardinals have worn for the past 18 seasons were dated and bad. Not a good combination. This is a change that needed to happen sooner rather than later and that's why I have them rated one notch above Carolina.

Is there something that will make your eyes pop out of your head and go WOW!?! No.


An overdone uniform was replaced by a minimalist uniform. It's addition by subtraction. They're not great by any stretch, but they're an improvement. I think we all can agree on that.

The Fix: Remove the obnoxiously large wordmark on the chest of the red jersey or simply replace it with 'CARDINALS' in smaller type similar to what is on the sleeves of the other two jerseys. 

I still maintain that Arizona missed the boat by using silver instead of copper. Arizona is the Copper State and a dark copper would have made for a much better trim color. The silver that is used will be hard to see against the white next to it. 

The other fix will be to mix-and-match within reason. The reveal only included mono-everything: white, red, and black. Hopefully, like Washington who did the same thing at their reveal a year ago, they won't be afraid to mix things up.

Grade: C (C+ if they mix-and-match)


#7 - CLEVELAND BROWNS

Two years ago, the Browns celebrated their 75th Anniversary by introducing an all-white throwback to their very first season - 1946. However, due to the One-Helmet Rule, the Browns had to use their regular orange helmets with modified features to pair with them. Now, with the OHR discontinued, Cleveland introduces a white helmet to pair with the throwbacks.


While the 1946 leather helmet was plain white, the Browns have added stripes and a browns facemask. Despite the stripes, the white helmet is a wonderful nod to the team's history despite technically not being totally accurate.


The Fix: Honestly the stripes shouldn't be there if the Browns were attempting to construct honest throwbacks to 1946. But someone probably had to be THAT GUY in the room that said "I know its supposed to be plain white but it's just TOO plain. Add some stripes." These are the Browns. The 'No-Logo-On-The-Helmet' Browns. Plain is in their DNA and they love it. Lose the stripes.

Grade: B


#6 - NEW YORK JETS

The Jets surprised the football world by unveiling throwback uniforms from the 1980s. The correct helmet logo is placed on the current metallic green helmet. No biggie. The uniform is a great representation of the look the throwback is mimicking. Jets fans will like it. 


The Fix: The only question I have is why is this franchise all of a sudden so averse to wearing green jerseys or pants? After the 2022 Preseason last year, the Jets wore green jerseys and pants together once and green pants below white jerseys once. That's it. Two games. Every other game was a combination of white or black pants and jerseys. I get that in the first half of the 1980s, the Jets wore white at home most of that time. However, with an infusion of green desperately needed, why not use the green throwback jersey instead?

Grade: B


#5 - SEATTLE SEAHAWKS

These throwbacks look phenomenal. The blue pops. The green is bright. The silver helmets sparkle. So why are the Seahawks only #5 for me?

It really isn't their fault. Due to modern jersey tailoring, sleeves nowadays probably only have about 40% of the area to work with compared to the jerseys they are trying to duplicate. For me, part of the appeal for the Seahawks' jerseys were how the stripes exiting behind the bird-head logo, continued all the way around the sleeve, and back around to the beak again. It was a brilliant effect, but, due to the minimal amount of space to work with, the current design can't offer that. 



The same can be said with the helmet logo. Due to modern helmets and their design, the facemask and chinstrap snaps force many helmet logos onto the back half of the helmet for several teams. This is one of those cases. One Twitter follower said he thought he was looking at a 1970s football card of DK Metcalf because he was positioned facing the camera (below) and the logo could not be seen. He honestly thought they had forgotten to add the logo to DK's helmet or that, as in cards from the 1970s, it had been airbrushed off. The result is that the amount of helmet logo that can be applied to this throwback's helmet is greatly reduced.


The Fix: Unfortunately, there isn't one. We are limited by the times. That incudes Nike's inability to reproduce the shiny silver pants that we should be getting with these uniforms. The Seahawks did well with what they had. They did a great job replicating a classic look that fans all over will love. No one will say "That's a terrible looking uniform."

Grade: B+


#4 - PHILADELPHIA EAGLES

Finally, kelly green has come back to Philadelphia. The thing I like the most about these uniforms is how the Eagles didn't have to use some sort of gimmick to get the correct logo to fit onto the sleeves. No abbreviated stripes. No reduced size. Just right.


The pants have the correct striping and are pretty close to the shade of grey/silver. The only regret here is that Nike could not replicate the sheen of those original pants (See "Big Jerome" below). It also seems like the helmet is lighter green than the jersey instead of being darker than the jersey. The helmet is significantly lighter overall compared to its predecessor. The sock stripes also appear to have thinned somewhat.


The Fix: The only thing I'd tamper with here is to darken the green of the helmets. Unfortunately, it's highly unlikely that Nike is capable of fixing the pants otherwise they'd have already done it for the reveal. Oh, and where the heck are the black shoes? Black shoes are a must for these.

Grade: A-


#3 - MINNESOTA VIKINGS

Let me start by saying that I'm not a Vikings fan. Their new throwback uniform goes back to their original look from 1961 and the first half of that decade, which is new ground for a Vikings throwback. Truthfully, everything about this uniform is 'spot-on.' Except for one detail. The helmet.


Why, if you are putting so much effort to get the look just right, do you make perfect versions of the jersey & the pants, but then drop the ball on the helmet? And here's the kicker...the Vikings are actually using a second helmet shell of a different color than their regular shade of purple. They had a chance to use the era-accurate glossy dark purple helmet shell. Instead, they opted for a lighter, matte purple than what was called for.


The Fix: If these throwbacks stick around, which I would guess they would, next year's throwback helmet will likely get fixed. I feel safe in that assumption. Why? Because the Vikings have done this before. 


As I stated in discussing Detroit's new helmet, when the Vikings debuted their current uniform set in 2014, the helmet didn't match. It was much too light. And it was highly noticeable on TV, to boot. Unfortunately, it took until 2019 for the Vikes to fix their purple helmets. But the point is, they did. This fix won't take as long. And like Philadelphia, these uniforms absolutely require black shoes, as well.

Grade: A-


#2 - TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS

Bucco Bruce and the creamsicle orange jerseys have returned. Nike went the extra mile and made these versions a more vibrant shade of orange than their 2012 efforts which were much paler by comparison. Even the red trim really jumps out at you. These were extremely well done and historically accurate.


The Fix: Nothing. But there is one thing to look for as far as being historically accurate. On the back of the helmets where the striping ends, the Bucs have always cut off the bottom corner of the red stripes' outer edges. It's a quirky little detail that I will be looking for. For some reason, the Bucs' reveal didn't include photos of the backs of the helmets.


GRADE: A


#1 - TENNESSEE TITANS

Sorry to disappoint, Bucs fans, but these are just a little bit better. And it's funny but no one will look at these uniforms and call them Titans' throwbacks. These are OILERS uniforms.

Why are they better? Accuracy and attention to detail. The number fonts are a perfect match. The bold red outline goes BANG when you see them. But the best part of all is how they purposely mismatched the blues. Normally, this would be a problem but not here. Historically, these Oilers' blue jersey uniforms were done using two similar, but separate, shades of blue. 


The jersey's blue needs to match the blue pants stripe. It does. The blue of the socks is slightly darker and matches the blue in the helmet logo and stripe. They do. You had to be aware of this ahead of time to plan the outcome the way it needed to be. They did. And it's magnificent.

The Fix: Are you kidding??? One thing, Titans. PLEASE do not have players disrespect one of the greatest uniforms ever by wearing plain white socks instead of, or overtop of, the actual uniform's socks. PLEASE!

Grade: A+


That wraps it up, folks. One thing is certain, in a League dominated by darker colored jerseys, the majority of these throwbacks bring us back to a day when vibrant, colorful uniforms adorned our TVs every Fall weekend. That is a very good thing.


Bill Schaefer


Wait, What... Don't Tell Me! I Messed Up Again!

Somehow a week ago on January 15, I messed up, by writing about Super Bowl XIII as being played on January 15, when even in the graphic I had the correct date of January 21, 1979.  The list I was looking at had the calendar year, not the season, so when I saw '1978' I should have realized it was the '1977' season's Super Bowl that was played on that day.

So, nonetheless, since the On This Day... for January 21st Super Bowl has already been added to the database, we shall today cover the Super Bowl from the day that we missed, Super Bowl XII.


Super Bowl XII
by Rob Holecko

America's Team the Dallas Cowboys captured their second Vince Lombardi trophy on January 15, 1978 when they defeated the Denver Broncos in Super Bowl XII 27 to 10.  The summary from Wikipedia:

Super Bowl XII was an American football game played on January 15, 1978 at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana to decide the National Football League (NFL) champion following the 1977 regular season. It was the first Super Bowl played inside a domed stadium.

The National Football Conference (NFC) champion Dallas Cowboys (15-2) defeated the American Football Conference (AFC) champion Denver Broncos (14-3), 27–10. The Cowboys defensive team dominated most of the game, forcing 8 turnovers and allowing only 8 pass completions by the Broncos for just 61 yards.

For the first and only time, two players won Super Bowl MVP honors: defensive tackle Randy White and defensive end Harvey Martin. For White, the honor was won on his 25th birthday. This was also the first time that a defensive lineman was named as the Super Bowl MVP.
We are proud to add this game to our database, and you can see it along with other Super Bowls that have been added on our new Super Bowl page.



Visit us tomorrow here at the Gridiron Uniform Database Blog where we'll preview the AFC and NFC Championships and also take a look back at a couple great Super Bowls from the 1980s played on January 22.

1962 Broncos Helmet Resolved (Probably)

Major database breakthrough...but first, this:

Those of you who are regular readers of the Gridiron Uniform Database Blog have probably noticed we have taken a break from regular blog updates over the past few weeks.

Frankly we have had to set the blog on the back-burner as real world issues have led to a greater demand on our time.

Anyway, the primary focus of The Gridiron Uniform Database is, and should continue to be, the database of images that truly make this site the one-of-a-kind reference tool that it is, on a par with other great internet sports uniform themed databases like baseball's Dressed To The Nines and, uh, what's that other great sports uniform site?  You know the one with all the soccer unis?  Yeah, that one.
So we have decided to "retool" our efforts around here, and place a greater emphasis on simply maintaining the database.  The new season kicks off a week from tomorrow, and I think you'll like how we will be displaying the current uniforms of the NFL on our front page as the season progresses.

This is not to say that we won't still have a blog, it just won't be the front page and main focus of the website -- that will from now on be the database.  We will still bring you articles relating to football uniforms whenever we have something worth blogging about.  It just won't be every day or on a specific schedule.

In the upcoming weeks we will be bringing you coverage of, and database updates from, Tim Brulia's second trip to the Library of Congress.
For those of you who do crave a daily dose of sports uniform blogness (and you know who you are) we urge you to continue to visit Uni Watch daily, which I'm sure you do already.

Also, those of you who have followed with great interest the Best NFL Uniform of All-Time Contest/Tournament, rest assured it too will still have a place on the website.  Look for it to return soon with all-new first round match-ups to vote on.

However, before we make this transition, there is absolutely one item that we must bring to you which those of you who read Uni Watch today are already aware of, and that is there are new developments regarding the 1962 Denver Broncos "Is it blue or is it brown" helmet, and here with the Gridiron Uniform Database's response, is our historian Tim Brulia:

~ ~ ~
 
Well, it looks like the mystery of the 1962 Broncos dark horse has apparently been solved. It's blue. In his blog, Denver Broncos' Vice President of Corporate Communications Jim Saccomano [no relation to this guy, with thanks to Adam R.W. in the Uni Watch comments] says he asked no less than three individuals with ties to the Broncos of the period in question; Chuck Garrity, former Denver Post sports editor, Ronnie Bill, who was the Broncos assistant equipment manager in 1962 and Al King, publicity man for the Broncs in '62. To a man, they all insist that Denver wore a blue horse on the helmets in early '62 as opposed to the brown bronco that has been surfacing on internet pages almost since the www gained public acceptance in the mid-late 1990's.

However, in the recent past, several players from that '62 Bronco team were asked the same question and they stated that the horse was brown. Personally speaking, the memory of those who directly worked for the team in the area that requires a bit more knowledge of what style of uniform was worn (publicist, equipment personnel) carries more weight than the players who wore them. Why? Players normally are more concerned with how the equipment feels and fits on them than what color they are. In other words, function-over-fashion. While men like PR guys are likely more of the fashion-over-form guys.

So, if indeed the horse was (as appears more and more likely) blue, then the question is: How did the urban legend of a brown horse gain so much acceptance? I myself have heard a couple of theories:
1) Coach Jack Faulkner was a Browns guy through and through. He wanted a little vestige of brown on the new look, NOT in tribute to the 1960-61 Broncos, but rather, to the Browns.
2) When ordering the new helmet decals from the supplier, the Broncos didn't specify the color. The supplier, unaware of the color change, printed up brown decals. The Broncos when receiving the logos, hurried up and used the decals anyway and then - to avoid confusion - simply re-ordered the exact same helmet decals, only in white.

Short of either actual written documentation from 1962, or a full color photograph or color film from one of these games or - better yet - an actual game used helmet surfacing from the early 1962 season, this is the most convincing piece of evidence available to us. So, the change for the 1962 Broncos template will be made and shortly our database will be reflecting the color of the horse as blue, as we now feel that is most likely the color they were..

And the quest for Gridiron Uniform Database perfection marches on.
~ ~ ~

Well, there you have it, you can never really consider a white whale caught, as long as it is still breathing.  Until we see that harpoon sticking out of its' gullet and Eskimos are sorting through the blubber, it is still just an assumption, as are many of our older database images.  As far as we know, all of the graphics in our database are correct.  Are there images that we are 100% sure of?  Yes.  Are there other images (many in fact) that we are 99.9999% sure of?  Yes.  Are there others that we are only 95% sure of?  Yes.  Are there images that are just an educated guess?  Yes.  

We stand by that all of the images that we present are what we believe to be the correct images.  Were we wrong to have presented the 1962 Bronco horse as being brown when others said it was blue?   No, at that time, we believed that it was most likely brown, or at least more likely to be brown than blue, and we presented that as such.  Now with this new evidence, we now believe that the horse was blue, so we will present it as such.
Perhaps next week a color photo will surface that will show that it was a brown horse, and we'll change it again.  But for the time being, we'll just have to stick to blue as being most likely.  If we only presented images that we were 100% certain are absolutely the correct images, we'd have a blank spot where the blue or brown helmet is.  We can only present the best information we can, given the research available to us.

But to follow up on Tim's theories of why (if it indeed is blue) did anyone think it was brown in the first place, I think the question to ask is:  Who was the first person to look at a black-and-white picture of the helmet and, not knowing what color it was, assume it was brown whichever color it isn't, and why would they do so?  If whoever had made that assumption, and any others that had followed, had never done so, and then the first internet pictures of the brown-horsed helmet had never existed, there possibly would never have been this controversy.  And what about the Frank Tripukas et al, who seem to remember that it was brown?  Were they just the victim of leading questions, or of their own faulty memories?  Or are they right and is this latest research erroneous in some way?  I guess like Tim says, until we see visual, incontrovertible proof either way, reliable eyewitness testimony and research is the best we can do, and now, after reviewing Saccomano's latest research, we at the Gridiron Uniform Database believe that the color of the horse on that helmet was blue.

Now, not speaking for Tim or Bill here, but my (Rob's) thoughts on the origin of the brown helmet?  I think someone just frankly didn't know what color it was, and just looked at the progression of Broncos' helmets, and this was all the information they were going off of:


Looking at this, and if I didn't know any more about it, I might have assumed that it was brown, too.  Well somebody did, and once this picture (to the right) got out on the internet, no one could be sure.

Had it really been brown, however, would there have been just as many incorrect pictures of a blue horsey?  But wait, what if it was, then there are, right?  But since it isn't, there aren't, right?  Huh?

I guess the logic could dictate that since there was much controversy over this, the picture that some of us thought it was must have been wrong, since now that we think that it is the color that we think it should be, it feels right.  Meaning, since all along we [the greater "we", not every one of us], in the back of our minds, felt it should have been blue, it was a controversy that it was being depicted as brown.  (It wasn't the helmets that were blue that were causing it to be a controversy, it was those helmets that were brown that were making it a controversy, because we thought they were wrong.  No one was making a "controversy" out of the existence of the helmets with the blue horse, were they?)

Therefore our greater sub-conscience is (and has been) telling us they must be blue.  But of course, without incontrovertible proof, our sub-conscience might be wrong, too.

While a commentor on Saccomano's blog is still unconvinced and says, "You now just have two groups of people relying on their memory," for me the segment of the blog that seals the deal is:

 "Ronnie Bill added that, “I was the one who put the decals on the helmets every week, and there was never any brown horse. Every week I had to touch up the helmets and get them ready for that week’s game. There was nothing brown in the 1962 uniform.”

If we believe that the guy who allegedly put the decals on the helmets (and his memory) is legit, then that's good enough for me.  Not incontrovertible, but in the 99.9% area, I would say.

Of course if a cynic wanted to, he could say that if perhaps the Broncos had an agenda in wanting to prove that the horse was a particular color, it wouldn't be hard for the team's PR guy to come up with three guys and make up some quotes.  Why would Ronnie Bill lie?  Well, why would Frank Tripuka lie, either?  What if Tripuka's memory is accurate and Bill's is faulty?  Well Ronnie Bill seems adamant.

Bottom line, we seem more certain now than ever that they were blue.  Have we absolutely, unequivocally proven it beyond a shadow of a doubt?  No.  The whale is still breathing, but on life support.

Saccomano says on his blog that the "mystery is solved," but he has the power to truly put it to rest once and for all.  If he truly does want to close the matter he needs to follow up in his blog and interview Gene Mingo, Frank Tripuka and Jerry Strum, those who have said that the horse was brown (Jack Faulkner died in 2008) and present them with his findings and report back in his blog their response.  If they, presented with this evidence reply something along the lines of: "Hmm. I swear, I thought they were brown, I guess I was mistaken," then that's one thing, however, if they respond: "I don't care what the equipment and PR guys say, I know, without a doubt that that horse on that helmet was brown," then the debate will continue.

Anyway, for the final word on this subject here is our graphical designer, Bill Schaefer:
Like the one poster in the comments at Uni Watch said, "Now we have one camp of really old guys saying blue and another camp of really old guys saying brown." 
Well, Bill, for us at the Gridiron Uniform Database, we'll say "blue", right?

"Oh sure, this we can find a color picture of."

History of the Buffalo Bills Uniforms Part II


     Here at The Gridiron Uniform Database we are continuing our week-long look back at the uniforms of the Buffalo Bills, who will be unveiling their new uniforms this Friday Night.

~ ~ ~



Jack Kemp led the Bills to
2 AFL titles in this uniform
     In 1962, the Bills adopted the red standing buffalo as their helmet logo.  The Bills wore this style, both with white and royal blue tops paired with white pants, through 1973.  In 1967, they also wore a darker blue during the preseason, and in the final year of this style, in '73, they added a little more red to the uniform (stripes and socks) and also added blue pants to go with the white jersey.

In the final game of the 1973 regular season the
Bills faced the Jets at Shea Stadium.
OJ Simpson entered the game with 1,803 yards
needing just 61 to break Jim Brown's
record.  Simpson gained the 61 yards early
in the game and finished the game with
192 yards compiling 2,003 for the season.
     Wearing this uniform the Bills won back-to-back AFL Championships in 1964 and 65, however the team fell on harder times after a few brief years, winning only one game in both 1968 and 1971.  After the NFL-AFL merger, the Bills never made the NFL playoffs with the red standing buffalo.  In their best season of this era, they went 9-5 and were only one game behind the AFC Wild Card Team, the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1973, their last with this helmet.  The seminal moment that people think of in this era, however, is not the 2 AFL titles, but the 2003 yards rushing by O.J. Simpson in 1973, a record set that was the football equivalent of the 61 homers of Roger Maris or the 100 points of Wilt Chamberlain.

     While in the last two decades the name O.J. Simpson conjures up images of a different sort, for two decades the name simply brought to mind one of the greatest running backs of his time, a man who's 1973 season put him in the company of Jim Brown, Gale Sayers and later Walter Payton, as the greatest rushers of all time.  Even with the off the field events that happened in 1994, Simpson's place in NFL history is still apparent:  When one sees the red standing buffalo of that era of Bills' football, one's first thoughts are of that first two-thousand yard rushing season.

~ ~ ~

1968 Cincinnati Bengals
1968 Denver Broncos
     Today for a database change, we'd like to bring you the updated uniforms of the 1968 Cincinnati Bengals and Denver Broncos. 1968 was the first year of play for the expansion Bengals, and in the preseason they faced the Broncos on August 10 in only their second game ever.  Based upon a newspaper article of that day submitted in the forums, we have made some adjustments to the uniforms of these two teams and added the preseason variations that we can confirm they wore in that game.

     If you look closely, you can see a difference in the Bengals' sleeve stripes from their regular season variation, there is a separation of white between the black and orange stripes.  The Broncos' variation is more apparent, they are paring their 1966 uniform with the 1968 helmet.


~ ~ ~

     We'll be back tomorrow with the next era of Bills' uniforms and some more database updates, including changes involving the Philadelphia Eagles and the Kansas City Chiefs, and even the New England Patriots.

Ch- Ch- Changes


     With all of the traffic we have received in the last few days, we had numerous updates and changes submitted by many visitors to the site, however, due to some technical difficulties, we have been unable to update them in the last day or two, so today we will devote the entire column to these changes. I've gotten some comments and e-mails that you all seemed to like the 'Mr. Wizard' theme video embed with Bill's column Monday, so I'm going to make embedding a youtube video a regular feature here at the website.  I'm not a big David Bowie fan, but I do have this song running through my head right now, and since we have so many "ch-ch-changes" to update, it seems apropos.

     With all of these changes today, we'll dispense with showing both 'before' and 'after' images, however we are working on a way of displaying the progression of previous database images which will give credit to the submitter for the change.      We'll start off with the 1948 New York Giants, thanks to bigbluelarry, who alerted us to some Charles Connerly pictures that showed a different helmet pattern than what we had.
     Another change that we made came to us from Dante X, who informed us that the 1993 New England Patriots -- the first year of the blue uniforms, when they wore numbers like this -- actually had gray facemasks.  I wonder if Dante is this guy, who was a coach on that team?  Probably not.

     After much debate we have decided to change the brown of the supposedly brown horse on the controversial early-season 1962 Broncos helmet.  This is not to say we endorse or don't endorse any particular theories about the said color of the horse, however, at this time, we have agreed it is probably more purplish-brown than just straight brown. Also a slight change in the angle of orientation of the horse from the previous image.  I'm sure this debate will continue.

     Speaking of the Broncos, we have a slew of changes thanks to anyonebutdetroit.  After looking at his submissions, the 1989-93 Broncos now have three stripes instead of five stripes on the sleeves, the nameplate has been changed for the 1994 to 96 uniforms, and we have added the monochrome blue look the Broncos wore in the 1997 preseason.  An additional change will be coming tomorrow as we have confirmed a mistake we had with their 1994 road throwback uniforms.
     We have changed the stripe pattern on the Philadelphia Eagles 1974 to 1984 uniform pants, it's wasn't much of a difference, but a small detail change none-the-less.  The image to the right is the new stripe pattern, there is now more silver showing between the green stripes and the white stripe in the middle.

     The Miami Dolphins franchise has had a few changes, for the 1973 image we have eliminated some of the combinations of the helmet and sock variations.  Compare this with the updated image to the right, and for the 1969 season, we also have some changes with the sock patterns.  As many of you know, the Dolphins in their early years have been very inconsistent with the uniforms.  They had two different helmets, one with the dolphin all the way across the sun, and another with the head of the dolphin inside the sun.  At times players have even worn different versions in the same game!


All these Dolphins changes come with thanks to dirwulf.

     Finally, a picture (right) surfacing from a 1969 preseason game between the Saints and the Lions has yielded a few changes.  This picture was seen at Chris Creamer's SportsLogos.net forum, and in it we can see that the Lions wore stripe-less jerseys, and the Saints debuted their 1970 nameplate-less jerseys.  Previously, we did not have the Saints' combo of wearing the white jerseys either with the black numbers in 1969, or with the preseason black helmet.  Isn't that Saints' black helmet cool?
   

1948 New York Giants
1993 New England Patriots
1962 Denver Broncos
1992 Denver Broncos
1997 Denver Broncos
1974-84 Philadelphia Eagles
1973 Miami Dolphins
1969 Miami Dolphins
1969 New Orleans Saints
1969 Detroit Lions
~ ~ ~

     Well, there you have it. Thanks to all those who have helped make this database that much better by offering corrections.  Keep them coming!  Tommorow we'll bring you that Broncos throwback change we mentioned, plus updates to the New York Giants and to a stripe pattern of the Minnesota Vikings for a year in the mid-1960's. Join our forum and you too can be part of the debate.

Twitter

Blog Archive

Tags